Random Notes
*In an attempt at buying some much needed new summer shoes, I looked at approximately 200 pairs on Sunday. I saw almost nothing that I wanted. The only pair I wanted was $250, and I just couldn’t justify spending that much on a perfectly plain pair of flats (I’m frivolous, but not that frivolous).
*By Sunday evening, I was in a weird funk (I get that way on Sundays sometimes), so Lord Kissington dragged me out for a walk and then bought me a BLT and some beers, which made things a lot better. He’s good like that.
*I read this long piece on the Duke rape case in Newsweek, and I was struck by the fact that they refer to the accuser and the other woman as “women,” but they refer to the lacrosse players as “boys.” Ummh, aren’t they all at least 18 and thus can be charged as adults? Let’s call them men, please. Calling the victim a woman, while referring to the alleged perpetrators as boys just smacks of editorializing.
2 Comments:
At 4/26/06, 4:20 AM,
Big Sky Girl said…
Some publications have the "under 21" rule. If the kids aren't yet 21 then they are boys/girls. I'm not sure how it got started but the AP stylebook reccomendation leaves room for crazy internal policies.
At 4/26/06, 5:37 PM,
bryc3 said…
god damn it, i google "under 21" and "publication" and this is what i come up with?
thanks a lot, etta.
Post a Comment
<< Home